Domain Invest

  • Subscribe to our RSS feed.
  • Twitter
  • StumbleUpon
  • Reddit
  • Facebook
  • Digg

Thursday, 24 January 2008

J&J Tests FDA's Pain Threshold with Tapentadol

Posted on 12:59 by Unknown
One line in Johnson & Johnson’s press release yesterday announcing the submission of a New Drug Application for the pain therapy tapentadol caught our eye:

"More than 1,800 patients have been treated with tapentadol IR tablets in clinical trials to date."

Which got us thinking: what makes J&J think they can get a new-ingredient product approved as a pain killer at today's FDA with data on only 1,800 patients? Haven't they noticed how tough it is to get new drugs through FDA, especially in the pain category?

Here are some possible answers:

(1) They are self-absorbed egotists with unfounded views of their own power and infallibility. But that can't be it, can it?

(2) J&J thinks that FDA will relent on pain products in the next year or so. It never hurts to be optimistic, but we haven't seen any signs of that yet.

(3) The product is for limited indications; J&J has a risk management program that will assure that it will stay in that population and they will sell the program to FDA as well as the drug’s safety.

Well, the press release says the product is for "moderate to severe pain" supported by studies in "patients undergoing bunionectomy surgery or for patients with degenerative, end-stage joint disease of the hip or knee," supported by a third study in "outpatients with low back pain or pain from osteoarthritis of the hip or knee." So it sure sounds like J&J is going after a big market based on relatively small studies. Not exactly a recipe for success by cautiously selecting a sub-population.

(4) There is something different about the way this product works which means that it will have no safety or abuse issues.

It surely doesn’t sound that way in the press release. J&J says it has "a unique profile with two mechanisms of action, combining mu-opioid receptor agonism and norepinephrine reuptake inhibition in a single molecule." That may be a great profile, but from a safety perspective it suggests a higher burden on J&J to show that the drug is free of two different potential risk profiles.

As for efficacy? According to J&J "data from these clinical trials suggest that tapentadol has efficacy comparable to strong opioids."

Is this a winning profile at today's FDA? We'll all find out later this year.
Email ThisBlogThis!Share to XShare to Facebook
Posted in drug approvals, drug safety, Johnson and Johnson, pain | No comments
Newer Post Older Post Home

0 comments:

Post a Comment

Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)

Popular Posts

  • While You Were Settling
    Well, it was an interesting weekend: the writers' strike may have been settled, Obama swept (and won a Grammy), and there was an unusual...
  • EPO Relabeling: Its Not the Black Box, Its What FDA Says About the Black Box
    Whoever said actions speak louder than words hasn’t been paying attention to the regulatory response to drug safety issues involving the ane...
  • The Wacky World of Generics: Fosamax Edition
    Today, Merck bids a fond farewell to its Fosamax franchise, as the first generic versions enter the market. Three generic firms are enteri...
  • Higher Tax, Fewer Deals?
    The IN VIVO Blog has been somewhat mum on the carried interest debate. Frankly, this topic is being covered to death elsewhere (The link g...
  • CardioNet's Not So Big Surprise
    Riddle us this. When is news not news at all? When it’s involving CardioNet Inc.’s Friday filing for an IPO . See, this filing was essential...
  • While You Were Staying Put
    It's always sunny in ... London? Lets kick off the weekend wrap-up by highlighting a trio of stories from The Times about incoming Glax...
  • While You Were Almost Upsetting
    We've been told by certain football (soccer) fans that there are not enough allusions to the beautiful game in our weekend roundups. So ...
  • FDA’s Search for a Drug Chief Not Going Well: An Internal Candidate Emerges
    We know all of you have been passing the time following the Presidential Primaries when the race you’re really interested in is who the next...
  • While You Were Redesigning Your Blog
    Does our blog look big in this? You may have noticed a few changes round these parts, and we hope you like them. No, not that the pace of o...
  • The Downsizing Opportunity: Pipeline on the Cheap?
    The IN VIVO Blog was in Michigan last week, attending a profiting-from-downsizing symposium. Would Pfizer—we wondered at the Michigan Growth...

Categories

  • Abbott
  • activist shareholders
  • ADHD
  • advisory committees
  • alliances
  • Alnylam
  • Alzheimer's disease
  • Amgen
  • Andrew von Eschenbach
  • Andrew Witty
  • Astellas
  • AstraZeneca
  • Avandia
  • Avastin
  • Barack Obama
  • Barr
  • Bayer
  • Big Pharma
  • BIO
  • Biogen Idec
  • biologics
  • biosimilars
  • blogging
  • BMS
  • Boston Scientific
  • brand names
  • business development
  • business models
  • cancer vaccines
  • Carl Icahn
  • CBO
  • CDER
  • Celgene
  • Cephalon
  • China
  • clinical development
  • CMS
  • co-promotes
  • comparative effectiveness
  • conference
  • Congress
  • consumer genomics
  • corporate culture
  • corporate governance
  • corporate venture capital
  • CVS Caremark
  • Cytyc
  • David Kessler
  • deals of the week
  • debt financing
  • Diabetes
  • diagnostics
  • Dick Clark
  • drug approvals
  • drug delivery
  • drug discovery
  • drug eluting stents
  • Drug Pricing
  • drug safety
  • drug samples
  • DTC Advertising
  • e-health
  • Eisai
  • Elan
  • Eli Lilly
  • Emphasys
  • emphysema
  • Endo
  • epo
  • Euro-Biotech Forum
  • Exits
  • Exubera
  • FDA
  • FDA/CMS Summit
  • FDAAA
  • Film and TV
  • financing
  • FOBs
  • Forest Labs
  • Galvus
  • gene therapy
  • Genentech
  • General Electric
  • generics
  • Genzyme
  • Gleevec
  • Google
  • GSK
  • Guidant
  • haircuts
  • Happy Holidays
  • HCV
  • Headhunting
  • Health Care Reform
  • hedge funds
  • Henry Waxman
  • hGH
  • HHS
  • Hillary Clinton
  • Hologic
  • hostile takeovers
  • hypertension
  • ImClone
  • IMS Health
  • In vitro diagnostics
  • In3
  • India
  • insomnia
  • instrumentation
  • insulin
  • Inverness
  • IP
  • IPO
  • IPO pricing
  • Isis Pharmaceuticals
  • Israel
  • IT
  • JAMA
  • Januvia
  • Japan
  • John McCain
  • Johnson and Johnson
  • JP Morgan
  • LaMattina
  • lawsuits
  • layoffs
  • legislation
  • Life-Cycle Management
  • Lipitor
  • Lucentis
  • management succession
  • Mark McClellan
  • marketing
  • Martin Mackay
  • medical devices
  • Medicare
  • Medicare Part D
  • Medimmune
  • Medtech Insight
  • Medtronic
  • Merck
  • Merck-Serono
  • mergers and acquisitions
  • Michael McCaughan
  • Millennium
  • mmm beer
  • MRI
  • multiple sclerosis
  • music
  • nanotechnology
  • NEJM
  • new drug approvals
  • new funds
  • NICE
  • NicOx
  • NIH
  • Nobel Prize
  • Novartis
  • Novo Nordisk
  • Nycomed
  • off-label promotion
  • oncology
  • ophthalmology
  • Orthopedics
  • osteoporosis
  • OTC drugs
  • Out-Partnering
  • Oxycontin
  • pain
  • Part D
  • Patient Advocacy
  • PDUFA
  • personalized medicine
  • Pfizer
  • pharmacy benefits
  • PhRMA
  • politics
  • poll results
  • PR
  • prasugrel
  • Presidential Election
  • Press Release of the Week
  • Primary Care
  • private equity
  • Procter and Gamble
  • PSA
  • Purdue Pharma
  • rare diseases
  • reimbursement
  • research and development productivity
  • research and development strategies
  • reverse mergers
  • rimonabant
  • RiskMAP
  • RNAi
  • Roche
  • Roger Longman
  • royalties
  • sales forces
  • Sanofi-aventis
  • Schering-Plough
  • Science Matters
  • Sepracor
  • shameless self-promotion
  • share buybacks
  • Shire
  • Sirtris
  • Smith and Nephew
  • Solvay
  • SPACs
  • spec pharma
  • spin-outs
  • sports
  • Start-Up
  • statins
  • Steve Nissen
  • Stryker
  • Supreme Court
  • Takeda
  • Teva
  • Thanksgiving
  • The RPM Report
  • UCB
  • vaccines
  • Velcade
  • Ventana
  • venture capital
  • venture debt
  • Venture Round
  • Vertex
  • Vioxx
  • Vytorin
  • Wacky World of Generics
  • While You Were ...
  • Wyeth
  • Zetia
  • Zimmer
  • ZymoGenetics

Blog Archive

  • ▼  2008 (76)
    • ►  February (25)
    • ▼  January (51)
      • "Consensus is not our goal": A Conversation with F...
      • Neuro Companies Causing Headaches
      • Who's Sorry Now? Not Feeling So Good Edition
      • A Mission at Risk
      • Close But No Cigar
      • Survey Says?! Too Little, Too Late
      • The Muddy Waters of IVD
      • Big Biotech M&A: Waiting for the Casus belli
      • Icahn to Biogen: Take a Mulligan
      • While You Were Almost Upsetting
      • FDA Gets Out in Front on Vytorin, Defends LDL Endp...
      • Deals of the Week: Beyond Vytoringate
      • The Best Defense Is a Good Offense, Or Something L...
      • Listen for the Threat of the Medicare Rebate
      • J&J Tests FDA's Pain Threshold with Tapentadol
      • Cardiovascular Systems Antes Up
      • Vytorin: Two Sources of Angst for DTC
      • Teva Buys Cogenesys
      • Ventana Accepts $3.4 Billion
      • Aye for an Eye
      • Vytorin: In this Case, Best to Ignore History
      • While You Were Losing Your Resolve
      • Deals of the Week: You Can't Always Get What You Want
      • Whose Life is it Anyway?
      • Bio-Rad Salutes You
      • Private Equity Goes Public
      • The Big Winner in the Vytorin Debacle? It Might be...
      • Orion to Cover Both Sides of the Atlantic
      • The Man Pharma Loves to Hate
      • Nissen Weighs in on ENHANCE
      • Lesson from the JPMorgan Conference: Exceptions Th...
      • Novo Scraps Inhaled Insulin
      • At JP Morgan, Stryker's Big Smile
      • Public Confidence in Drug Safety: Solution is in "...
      • While You Were Staying Put
      • Deals of the Week: far from the Westin St. Francis
      • Amgen Braces for Another Review of EPO Safety: How...
      • Biotech’s Original Sin
      • The R&D Productivity Crisis: Is There a Bright Side?
      • DTC User Fees Shot Down; Advertisers Face More Per...
      • Iowans Fall for Obama, Will New Hampshireites?
      • “We’re a Buyer, not a Seller,” Says Genzyme With I...
      • The Stakes Increase on Comparative Effectiveness
      • While You Were Going to California
      • Regulatory Sausage Making
      • Deals of the Week: New Year's Resolutions
      • Another Dismal Year for New Drug Approvals
      • Addex Ups Dealmaking Ante
      • Congress Has Lump of Coal for FDA in Funding Bill
      • New Year's Resolution 2008: Create Infrastructure ...
      • The Top Ten IN VIVO Blog Posts of 2007
  • ►  2007 (329)
    • ►  December (32)
    • ►  November (42)
    • ►  October (37)
    • ►  September (33)
    • ►  August (29)
    • ►  July (39)
    • ►  June (39)
    • ►  May (43)
    • ►  April (16)
    • ►  March (13)
    • ►  February (5)
    • ►  January (1)
  • ►  2006 (8)
    • ►  December (3)
    • ►  November (5)
Powered by Blogger.

About Me

Unknown
View my complete profile