Domain Invest

  • Subscribe to our RSS feed.
  • Twitter
  • StumbleUpon
  • Reddit
  • Facebook
  • Digg

Thursday, 15 November 2007

Avandia’s Black Box: FDA Office of New Drugs Wins

Posted on 09:55 by Unknown
Yesterday FDA settled a very public internal disagreement by adding another “black box” warning to GlaxoSmithKline’s diabetes drug rosiglitazone Avandia.

The message to biopharmaceutical companies is that the agency’s Office of New Drugs within the Center for Drug Evaluation & Research is the final arbiter of drug safety decisions—not the drug safety group housed by the Office of Surveillance and Epidemiology.

OND’s opinion clearly carried more weight than the OSE staff headed by Gerald Dal Pan when it came to a final resolution on how to handle the heart attack risks associated with Avandia.

A joint panel meeting of FDA Metabolic & Endocrinologic Drugs and Drug Safety & Risk Management advisory committees on July 30 showcased a fissure between OND and OSE. Two high-ranking officials, OSE’s Dal Pan and Office of Drug Evaluation II Director Robert Meyer, openly disagreed over whether Avandia should stay on the market.

Dal Pan staked his reputation by agreeing with OSE director of science and medicine David Graham that Avandia be withdrawn. “While I may disagree with [Graham] on some minor technical issues and the strength of any one given piece of evidence or other, he and I have both concluded that when we look at the data, the balance of benefits and risks of rosiglitazone is not favorable,” Dal Pan said at the meeting.

Meyer countered OSE’s presentation: “I think it is important the committee understand there is a fundamental disagreement within CDER on the scientific conclusions that should be drawn from the information available.”

Months after the meeting, in October, FDA’s drug safety oversight board voted 8-7 to keep the drug on the market, according to Senator Chuck Grassley (R-Iowa) and his investigational staff. The board is made up of federal officials from FDA and other agencies and deliberations are not public.

Fast forward to FDA’s November 14 announcement on Avandia: “We are keeping Avandia on the market because we have concluded that there is not enough evidence to conclude that the risk for heart attack or cardiac ischemia is higher than for other Type 2 diabetes drugs,” FDA chief medical officer and acting CDER director Janet Woodcock said during a media briefing.

Here is what the new box warning says:

A meta-analysis of 42 clinical studies (mean duration 6 months; 14,237 total patients), most of which compared Avandia to placebo, showed Avandia to be associated with an increased risk of myocardial ischemic events such as angina or myocardial infarction. Three other studies (mean duration 41 months; 14,067 patients), comparing Avandia to some other approved oral antidiabetic agents or placebo, have not confirmed or excluded this risk. In their entirety, the available data on the risk of myocardial ischemia are inconclusive.

FDA is requiring GSK to conduct a long-term study to evaluate the potential cardiovascular risk of Avandia compared to an active control agent and develop a MedGuide for patients including new information on the potential risks of rosiglitazone.

GSK must be popping champagne right now as this was the best possible outcome for the company considering the situation. Check out the timeline for the randomized trial: the final protocol for the study is due by July 31, 2008; the study is expected to start by November 30, 2008; and the final study report of full results is due by the end of March 2014. The first patents for Avandia expire in 2011, with some running until 2017, according to FDA’s Orange Book.

In other words, the company just bought seven years of continued marketing for Avandia.

FDA says the public will know more about the drug before the end of the study. “There would be interim data probably,” Woodcock added. “It isn’t as if we’re going to be clueless until 2014.”

Nevertheless, there is no doubt that there was a chasm-like split over keeping Avandia on the market or removing it. In the end, the Office of New Drugs’ opinion carried the day.

You can read our in-depth takes on the Avandia debacle and fallout in The RPM Report and IN VIVO here and here.

Email ThisBlogThis!Share to XShare to Facebook
Posted in Avandia, drug safety, FDA, GSK | No comments
Newer Post Older Post Home

0 comments:

Post a Comment

Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)

Popular Posts

  • While You Were Settling
    Well, it was an interesting weekend: the writers' strike may have been settled, Obama swept (and won a Grammy), and there was an unusual...
  • EPO Relabeling: Its Not the Black Box, Its What FDA Says About the Black Box
    Whoever said actions speak louder than words hasn’t been paying attention to the regulatory response to drug safety issues involving the ane...
  • The Wacky World of Generics: Fosamax Edition
    Today, Merck bids a fond farewell to its Fosamax franchise, as the first generic versions enter the market. Three generic firms are enteri...
  • Higher Tax, Fewer Deals?
    The IN VIVO Blog has been somewhat mum on the carried interest debate. Frankly, this topic is being covered to death elsewhere (The link g...
  • CardioNet's Not So Big Surprise
    Riddle us this. When is news not news at all? When it’s involving CardioNet Inc.’s Friday filing for an IPO . See, this filing was essential...
  • While You Were Staying Put
    It's always sunny in ... London? Lets kick off the weekend wrap-up by highlighting a trio of stories from The Times about incoming Glax...
  • While You Were Almost Upsetting
    We've been told by certain football (soccer) fans that there are not enough allusions to the beautiful game in our weekend roundups. So ...
  • FDA’s Search for a Drug Chief Not Going Well: An Internal Candidate Emerges
    We know all of you have been passing the time following the Presidential Primaries when the race you’re really interested in is who the next...
  • While You Were Redesigning Your Blog
    Does our blog look big in this? You may have noticed a few changes round these parts, and we hope you like them. No, not that the pace of o...
  • The Downsizing Opportunity: Pipeline on the Cheap?
    The IN VIVO Blog was in Michigan last week, attending a profiting-from-downsizing symposium. Would Pfizer—we wondered at the Michigan Growth...

Categories

  • Abbott
  • activist shareholders
  • ADHD
  • advisory committees
  • alliances
  • Alnylam
  • Alzheimer's disease
  • Amgen
  • Andrew von Eschenbach
  • Andrew Witty
  • Astellas
  • AstraZeneca
  • Avandia
  • Avastin
  • Barack Obama
  • Barr
  • Bayer
  • Big Pharma
  • BIO
  • Biogen Idec
  • biologics
  • biosimilars
  • blogging
  • BMS
  • Boston Scientific
  • brand names
  • business development
  • business models
  • cancer vaccines
  • Carl Icahn
  • CBO
  • CDER
  • Celgene
  • Cephalon
  • China
  • clinical development
  • CMS
  • co-promotes
  • comparative effectiveness
  • conference
  • Congress
  • consumer genomics
  • corporate culture
  • corporate governance
  • corporate venture capital
  • CVS Caremark
  • Cytyc
  • David Kessler
  • deals of the week
  • debt financing
  • Diabetes
  • diagnostics
  • Dick Clark
  • drug approvals
  • drug delivery
  • drug discovery
  • drug eluting stents
  • Drug Pricing
  • drug safety
  • drug samples
  • DTC Advertising
  • e-health
  • Eisai
  • Elan
  • Eli Lilly
  • Emphasys
  • emphysema
  • Endo
  • epo
  • Euro-Biotech Forum
  • Exits
  • Exubera
  • FDA
  • FDA/CMS Summit
  • FDAAA
  • Film and TV
  • financing
  • FOBs
  • Forest Labs
  • Galvus
  • gene therapy
  • Genentech
  • General Electric
  • generics
  • Genzyme
  • Gleevec
  • Google
  • GSK
  • Guidant
  • haircuts
  • Happy Holidays
  • HCV
  • Headhunting
  • Health Care Reform
  • hedge funds
  • Henry Waxman
  • hGH
  • HHS
  • Hillary Clinton
  • Hologic
  • hostile takeovers
  • hypertension
  • ImClone
  • IMS Health
  • In vitro diagnostics
  • In3
  • India
  • insomnia
  • instrumentation
  • insulin
  • Inverness
  • IP
  • IPO
  • IPO pricing
  • Isis Pharmaceuticals
  • Israel
  • IT
  • JAMA
  • Januvia
  • Japan
  • John McCain
  • Johnson and Johnson
  • JP Morgan
  • LaMattina
  • lawsuits
  • layoffs
  • legislation
  • Life-Cycle Management
  • Lipitor
  • Lucentis
  • management succession
  • Mark McClellan
  • marketing
  • Martin Mackay
  • medical devices
  • Medicare
  • Medicare Part D
  • Medimmune
  • Medtech Insight
  • Medtronic
  • Merck
  • Merck-Serono
  • mergers and acquisitions
  • Michael McCaughan
  • Millennium
  • mmm beer
  • MRI
  • multiple sclerosis
  • music
  • nanotechnology
  • NEJM
  • new drug approvals
  • new funds
  • NICE
  • NicOx
  • NIH
  • Nobel Prize
  • Novartis
  • Novo Nordisk
  • Nycomed
  • off-label promotion
  • oncology
  • ophthalmology
  • Orthopedics
  • osteoporosis
  • OTC drugs
  • Out-Partnering
  • Oxycontin
  • pain
  • Part D
  • Patient Advocacy
  • PDUFA
  • personalized medicine
  • Pfizer
  • pharmacy benefits
  • PhRMA
  • politics
  • poll results
  • PR
  • prasugrel
  • Presidential Election
  • Press Release of the Week
  • Primary Care
  • private equity
  • Procter and Gamble
  • PSA
  • Purdue Pharma
  • rare diseases
  • reimbursement
  • research and development productivity
  • research and development strategies
  • reverse mergers
  • rimonabant
  • RiskMAP
  • RNAi
  • Roche
  • Roger Longman
  • royalties
  • sales forces
  • Sanofi-aventis
  • Schering-Plough
  • Science Matters
  • Sepracor
  • shameless self-promotion
  • share buybacks
  • Shire
  • Sirtris
  • Smith and Nephew
  • Solvay
  • SPACs
  • spec pharma
  • spin-outs
  • sports
  • Start-Up
  • statins
  • Steve Nissen
  • Stryker
  • Supreme Court
  • Takeda
  • Teva
  • Thanksgiving
  • The RPM Report
  • UCB
  • vaccines
  • Velcade
  • Ventana
  • venture capital
  • venture debt
  • Venture Round
  • Vertex
  • Vioxx
  • Vytorin
  • Wacky World of Generics
  • While You Were ...
  • Wyeth
  • Zetia
  • Zimmer
  • ZymoGenetics

Blog Archive

  • ►  2008 (76)
    • ►  February (25)
    • ►  January (51)
  • ▼  2007 (329)
    • ►  December (32)
    • ▼  November (42)
      • Prasugrel: Lilly Tries to Stop the Bleeding (Part 1)
      • Deals of the Week: For Sale By Owner
      • Has Forest Found a Successful NDA Path?
      • Sanofi Aventis Walks the Talk
      • Sirtris Strikes Again
      • Emergent Emerges
      • DTC User Fees Clear First Hurdle; New Era for Adve...
      • Frazier Joins $600m Club
      • The Values Debate: How Much is Your Drug Worth?
      • While You Were Giving Thanks
      • Quite A Set of Lung (Companies)
      • Uncertainty Surrounds FDAAA Implementation
      • Deals of the Week: The Alice's Restaurant Edition ...
      • What's Next for Celgene?
      • Who Needs VCs?
      • Pharmion’s Euro Bet Pays Off
      • DTC User Fees: Will This Program Fly?
      • Delivery Delays
      • While You Were Acquiring
      • Venture Rounds: You Stay Classy, San Diego
      • Deals of the Week: The Break Up to Make Up Edition
      • Why Genzyme's Unlikely to be the Next Target
      • Avandia’s Black Box: FDA Office of New Drugs Wins
      • Where's the Love?
      • Why Doesn't Pharma Hire from Biotech?
      • Dicerna Announces Series A, Nastech Announces Spin...
      • Ventana Plays Ball
      • Disappearing Act
      • Co-Promotes are Out. Extra Royalties are In
      • While You Were ...
      • EPO Relabeling: Its Not the Black Box, Its What FD...
      • Deals of the Week--the Rerun Edition
      • Biovitrum Sheds PC Assets
      • Shire Steps Up Pressure on Genzyme
      • The Disaggregation Road
      • What Does the FDA Drug Safety Law Mean for Drug De...
      • Horse Sense
      • Momenta: Oh, Sugar!
      • The Expanding Pharmaceutical Desert
      • While You Were at AHA
      • Deals of the Week: "King of Pain" Edition
      • Press Release of the Week: Drug Delivery!
    • ►  October (37)
    • ►  September (33)
    • ►  August (29)
    • ►  July (39)
    • ►  June (39)
    • ►  May (43)
    • ►  April (16)
    • ►  March (13)
    • ►  February (5)
    • ►  January (1)
  • ►  2006 (8)
    • ►  December (3)
    • ►  November (5)
Powered by Blogger.

About Me

Unknown
View my complete profile