Domain Invest

  • Subscribe to our RSS feed.
  • Twitter
  • StumbleUpon
  • Reddit
  • Facebook
  • Digg

Wednesday, 27 June 2007

In Our Face

Posted on 06:00 by Unknown
Take THAT, IN VIVO Blog.

Boston Scientific Corp., in an obvious thumbing of the nose to our suggestion that it wouldn’t be acquiring new companies any time soon, did just that.
The Natick, Mass. company reached an agreement to buy Remon Medical Technologies Inc., a privately held and venture-backed company based in Caesarea, Israel.

(We know. This is Karl Rove, not Jim Tobin.)

The acquisition shouldn't be seen as a sign that Boston Scientific is out shopping again. The company inherited a business agreement between Remon and Guidant Corp. established in 2004, long before Boston Scientific acquired the latter for $27 billion last year. Boston Scientific presumably is still busy fixing Guidant and identifying potential business to divest.

Boston Scientific clearly is excited at the potential of remote monitoring. CEO Jim Tobin singled out the former Guidant’s Latitude monitoring system in past speeches. Fred Colen, executive vice president of operations and technology, CRM and Chief Technology officer, said in a statement, “This acquisition reflects our commitment to being a leader in the CRM market through the introduction of innovative products and services for the benefit of physicians and their patients."

Read a lot more about Remon and other remote monitoring companies here. To sum up, the company has a platform to develop miniature devices capable of using ultrasound for a multitude of reasons from monitoring to drug delivery to tissue stimulation.

We may have more on the acquisition in the next START-UP. For now, here’s a quick Q&A with CEO Hezi Himelfarb and Terry McGuire, general partner at Polaris Venture Partners, one of Remon’s earlier investors. (Terms weren't disclosed, btw, but McGuire seemed very happy with the outcome.)

IN VIVO Blog: So who approached whom about merging?
McGuire: We already had relationship with Guidant that was going on a couple of years. And that turned out to be a prosperous relationship in the sense that we really developed some important technology that Boston Scientific recognized would continue to be important. And through the [Guidant] acquisition we got to know Boston Scientific even better and the time seemed right to talk about merging the companies.


IVB: Were there other opportunities for an exit? Did CardioMEMS failed IPO make a sale more appealing?
McGuire: CardioMEMS has a very different business model. CardioMEMS never entered into our relationship in any way. This acquisition was based on a relationship that had been evolving over two years. It’s what I would describe is a perfect baton pass. Here is this really innovative company and Boston Scientific saw what they could do with this. It was based on a long-term relationship. It really wasn’t based on the fact CardioMEMS did XYZ. Remon had a very strong balance sheet. It wasn’t like we needed to do anything.


IVB: Were there other options for Remon?
Himelfarb: We’ve been actually working on evaluating other [partnership] opportunities with other companies and there was a lot of interest in our technology because our technology is actually the only one today that provides real intrabody communication in a totally wireless manner …But eventually you can do such a deal with one company and luckily Boston Scientific was the one.


IVB: Where do you fit into BSX?
Himelfarb: Right now we are continuing exactly as we were. We continue to be in our facility which is located in Israel with the same employees, same management team. Everything actually remains the same. Then, probably again after a short-period of training and education we will find out what are the objectives. For now we are staying the same as before the acquisition.


IVB: Any changes within the next 12 months?
Himelfarb: I believe after they learn more about our technology they may do some changes in the focus of the company
Email ThisBlogThis!Share to XShare to Facebook
Posted in Boston Scientific, mergers and acquisitions | No comments
Newer Post Older Post Home

0 comments:

Post a Comment

Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)

Popular Posts

  • While You Were Settling
    Well, it was an interesting weekend: the writers' strike may have been settled, Obama swept (and won a Grammy), and there was an unusual...
  • EPO Relabeling: Its Not the Black Box, Its What FDA Says About the Black Box
    Whoever said actions speak louder than words hasn’t been paying attention to the regulatory response to drug safety issues involving the ane...
  • The Wacky World of Generics: Fosamax Edition
    Today, Merck bids a fond farewell to its Fosamax franchise, as the first generic versions enter the market. Three generic firms are enteri...
  • Higher Tax, Fewer Deals?
    The IN VIVO Blog has been somewhat mum on the carried interest debate. Frankly, this topic is being covered to death elsewhere (The link g...
  • CardioNet's Not So Big Surprise
    Riddle us this. When is news not news at all? When it’s involving CardioNet Inc.’s Friday filing for an IPO . See, this filing was essential...
  • While You Were Staying Put
    It's always sunny in ... London? Lets kick off the weekend wrap-up by highlighting a trio of stories from The Times about incoming Glax...
  • While You Were Almost Upsetting
    We've been told by certain football (soccer) fans that there are not enough allusions to the beautiful game in our weekend roundups. So ...
  • FDA’s Search for a Drug Chief Not Going Well: An Internal Candidate Emerges
    We know all of you have been passing the time following the Presidential Primaries when the race you’re really interested in is who the next...
  • While You Were Redesigning Your Blog
    Does our blog look big in this? You may have noticed a few changes round these parts, and we hope you like them. No, not that the pace of o...
  • The Downsizing Opportunity: Pipeline on the Cheap?
    The IN VIVO Blog was in Michigan last week, attending a profiting-from-downsizing symposium. Would Pfizer—we wondered at the Michigan Growth...

Categories

  • Abbott
  • activist shareholders
  • ADHD
  • advisory committees
  • alliances
  • Alnylam
  • Alzheimer's disease
  • Amgen
  • Andrew von Eschenbach
  • Andrew Witty
  • Astellas
  • AstraZeneca
  • Avandia
  • Avastin
  • Barack Obama
  • Barr
  • Bayer
  • Big Pharma
  • BIO
  • Biogen Idec
  • biologics
  • biosimilars
  • blogging
  • BMS
  • Boston Scientific
  • brand names
  • business development
  • business models
  • cancer vaccines
  • Carl Icahn
  • CBO
  • CDER
  • Celgene
  • Cephalon
  • China
  • clinical development
  • CMS
  • co-promotes
  • comparative effectiveness
  • conference
  • Congress
  • consumer genomics
  • corporate culture
  • corporate governance
  • corporate venture capital
  • CVS Caremark
  • Cytyc
  • David Kessler
  • deals of the week
  • debt financing
  • Diabetes
  • diagnostics
  • Dick Clark
  • drug approvals
  • drug delivery
  • drug discovery
  • drug eluting stents
  • Drug Pricing
  • drug safety
  • drug samples
  • DTC Advertising
  • e-health
  • Eisai
  • Elan
  • Eli Lilly
  • Emphasys
  • emphysema
  • Endo
  • epo
  • Euro-Biotech Forum
  • Exits
  • Exubera
  • FDA
  • FDA/CMS Summit
  • FDAAA
  • Film and TV
  • financing
  • FOBs
  • Forest Labs
  • Galvus
  • gene therapy
  • Genentech
  • General Electric
  • generics
  • Genzyme
  • Gleevec
  • Google
  • GSK
  • Guidant
  • haircuts
  • Happy Holidays
  • HCV
  • Headhunting
  • Health Care Reform
  • hedge funds
  • Henry Waxman
  • hGH
  • HHS
  • Hillary Clinton
  • Hologic
  • hostile takeovers
  • hypertension
  • ImClone
  • IMS Health
  • In vitro diagnostics
  • In3
  • India
  • insomnia
  • instrumentation
  • insulin
  • Inverness
  • IP
  • IPO
  • IPO pricing
  • Isis Pharmaceuticals
  • Israel
  • IT
  • JAMA
  • Januvia
  • Japan
  • John McCain
  • Johnson and Johnson
  • JP Morgan
  • LaMattina
  • lawsuits
  • layoffs
  • legislation
  • Life-Cycle Management
  • Lipitor
  • Lucentis
  • management succession
  • Mark McClellan
  • marketing
  • Martin Mackay
  • medical devices
  • Medicare
  • Medicare Part D
  • Medimmune
  • Medtech Insight
  • Medtronic
  • Merck
  • Merck-Serono
  • mergers and acquisitions
  • Michael McCaughan
  • Millennium
  • mmm beer
  • MRI
  • multiple sclerosis
  • music
  • nanotechnology
  • NEJM
  • new drug approvals
  • new funds
  • NICE
  • NicOx
  • NIH
  • Nobel Prize
  • Novartis
  • Novo Nordisk
  • Nycomed
  • off-label promotion
  • oncology
  • ophthalmology
  • Orthopedics
  • osteoporosis
  • OTC drugs
  • Out-Partnering
  • Oxycontin
  • pain
  • Part D
  • Patient Advocacy
  • PDUFA
  • personalized medicine
  • Pfizer
  • pharmacy benefits
  • PhRMA
  • politics
  • poll results
  • PR
  • prasugrel
  • Presidential Election
  • Press Release of the Week
  • Primary Care
  • private equity
  • Procter and Gamble
  • PSA
  • Purdue Pharma
  • rare diseases
  • reimbursement
  • research and development productivity
  • research and development strategies
  • reverse mergers
  • rimonabant
  • RiskMAP
  • RNAi
  • Roche
  • Roger Longman
  • royalties
  • sales forces
  • Sanofi-aventis
  • Schering-Plough
  • Science Matters
  • Sepracor
  • shameless self-promotion
  • share buybacks
  • Shire
  • Sirtris
  • Smith and Nephew
  • Solvay
  • SPACs
  • spec pharma
  • spin-outs
  • sports
  • Start-Up
  • statins
  • Steve Nissen
  • Stryker
  • Supreme Court
  • Takeda
  • Teva
  • Thanksgiving
  • The RPM Report
  • UCB
  • vaccines
  • Velcade
  • Ventana
  • venture capital
  • venture debt
  • Venture Round
  • Vertex
  • Vioxx
  • Vytorin
  • Wacky World of Generics
  • While You Were ...
  • Wyeth
  • Zetia
  • Zimmer
  • ZymoGenetics

Blog Archive

  • ►  2008 (76)
    • ►  February (25)
    • ►  January (51)
  • ▼  2007 (329)
    • ►  December (32)
    • ►  November (42)
    • ►  October (37)
    • ►  September (33)
    • ►  August (29)
    • ►  July (39)
    • ▼  June (39)
      • Could've Seen That One Coming
      • Private Equity: Muscling in on Big Pharma at Biote...
      • Live from Paris: Roger's dealmaking overview
      • In Our Face
      • Welcome to Paris: take my drug ... Please
      • Roche to Ventana: We want you so bad
      • Good Things Come
      • Roche makes Ventana an offer it may or may not be ...
      • Big Week For the Bushes
      • Venture Debt in Europe: Opportunity Missed?
      • While You Were at ADA
      • Brailer's New Quest
      • The Wrong Man for This Job
      • Overheard at the London Stock Exchange Mediscience...
      • Preserving the Right to Advertise—No Matter How Du...
      • Sometimes the Bear Gets You: Coley Pharmaceuticals...
      • Why No More Roche-Genentechs?
      • Size Matters for Specialist Drugs, Too
      • The Other Surge
      • Should Some of these Butterflies Get Eaten?
      • While You Were Celebrating Father's Day ...
      • What Drug Makers Can Learn from Vaccines
      • Rimonabant’s Risky Business
      • Is FDA Killing Research?
      • Record VC dough for device makers
      • Israel’s Public Venture Market
      • CVS/Caremark Loses a Big One
      • Fat Chance for Rimonabant
      • Launching Alli
      • While You Were Watching the Finale
      • It must be two-for-one week on private biotechs
      • The Wisdom of Buybacks
      • PhRMA's DTC Verdict: it ain't broke, we're not gon...
      • R&D: Worth It Only When You Don’t Pay for It
      • Amgen buys Ilypsa for $420mm cash
      • Hi, I’m from Medtronic. My name is …
      • No Cure, No Pay
      • While You Were in the Cheap Seats
      • Jazz IPO Fails to Generate Buzz
    • ►  May (43)
    • ►  April (16)
    • ►  March (13)
    • ►  February (5)
    • ►  January (1)
  • ►  2006 (8)
    • ►  December (3)
    • ►  November (5)
Powered by Blogger.

About Me

Unknown
View my complete profile