Domain Invest

  • Subscribe to our RSS feed.
  • Twitter
  • StumbleUpon
  • Reddit
  • Facebook
  • Digg

Thursday, 19 April 2007

Antisoma Licenses AS1404: The Sequel

Posted on 00:24 by Unknown
Only occasionally are sequels better than the original. The Godfather Part II. The Empire Strikes Back, of course. Add to those classics UK biotech Antisoma's second go-around with its vascular disrupting agent AS1404, which today it partnered with Novartis in a world-wide deal worth up to $890 million (including $100 million in near-term payments) plus royalties. Novartis will conduct and fund all development in all indications going forward.


Only ten months ago Roche returned rights to 1404 to Antisoma, on the same day Antisoma reported positive Phase II proof of concept results in lung cancer. Since then the biotech has issued a steady stream of positive news surrounding the product and hinted at serious interest from would-be pharmaceutical partners.

The original Roche deal was broad, encompassing Antisoma's entire clinical pipeline, including the Phase III ovarian cancer candidate pemtumomab, and a raft of Phase I compounds including 1404 (then known as DMXAA, and recently acquired by Antisoma from the non-profit Cancer Research Campaign for about $1 million). That deal included cost-sharing provisions for clinical trials of 1404 and other compounds but where Antisoma stood to gain the most was when drugs entered Phase III. Roche, citing commercial considerations, pulled the plug and returned all rights to Antisoma in June 2006.

At the time, noted Antisoma CEO Glyn Edwards today on a call to announce the Novartis deal, there was little clinical data available on 1404. "We were just starting to see survival data in the lung at that time," he says. There is a lot more clinical data available now, and Roche's decision was only partly related to 14o4 itself, says Edwards. The pharma's own portfolio was taken into consideration, and "Roche made the right decision for Roche just as Novartis has made the right decision for Novartis."

Roche it turns out also made the right decision for Antisoma. The Novartis deal is much more lucrative than anything Antisoma would have received from Roche, reflecting both the drug's clinical success to-date and the realities of biotech-pharma partnering today. Novartis will pay $75 million up front and $380 million in developmental milestones spread over four oncology indications and one non-oncology indication; future sales milestones could reach $325 million. Not least Antisoma has retained the right to co-promote the product in the US, a privilege Novartis will partially fund.

"Any Antisoma reps will have the ability to co-detail other Antisoma products" in the future, says Edwards, which "gives us a lower-cost, lower-risk entry into the US oncology market." It also means that in addition to adding early-stage assets via the biotech's business development efforts, Antisoma can also look to bring in mid-stage oncology candidates with an eye toward marketing niche products in the US, he says.
Email ThisBlogThis!Share to XShare to Facebook
Posted in Novartis, oncology | No comments
Newer Post Older Post Home

0 comments:

Post a Comment

Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)

Popular Posts

  • While You Were Settling
    Well, it was an interesting weekend: the writers' strike may have been settled, Obama swept (and won a Grammy), and there was an unusual...
  • EPO Relabeling: Its Not the Black Box, Its What FDA Says About the Black Box
    Whoever said actions speak louder than words hasn’t been paying attention to the regulatory response to drug safety issues involving the ane...
  • The Wacky World of Generics: Fosamax Edition
    Today, Merck bids a fond farewell to its Fosamax franchise, as the first generic versions enter the market. Three generic firms are enteri...
  • Higher Tax, Fewer Deals?
    The IN VIVO Blog has been somewhat mum on the carried interest debate. Frankly, this topic is being covered to death elsewhere (The link g...
  • CardioNet's Not So Big Surprise
    Riddle us this. When is news not news at all? When it’s involving CardioNet Inc.’s Friday filing for an IPO . See, this filing was essential...
  • While You Were Staying Put
    It's always sunny in ... London? Lets kick off the weekend wrap-up by highlighting a trio of stories from The Times about incoming Glax...
  • While You Were Almost Upsetting
    We've been told by certain football (soccer) fans that there are not enough allusions to the beautiful game in our weekend roundups. So ...
  • FDA’s Search for a Drug Chief Not Going Well: An Internal Candidate Emerges
    We know all of you have been passing the time following the Presidential Primaries when the race you’re really interested in is who the next...
  • While You Were Redesigning Your Blog
    Does our blog look big in this? You may have noticed a few changes round these parts, and we hope you like them. No, not that the pace of o...
  • The Downsizing Opportunity: Pipeline on the Cheap?
    The IN VIVO Blog was in Michigan last week, attending a profiting-from-downsizing symposium. Would Pfizer—we wondered at the Michigan Growth...

Categories

  • Abbott
  • activist shareholders
  • ADHD
  • advisory committees
  • alliances
  • Alnylam
  • Alzheimer's disease
  • Amgen
  • Andrew von Eschenbach
  • Andrew Witty
  • Astellas
  • AstraZeneca
  • Avandia
  • Avastin
  • Barack Obama
  • Barr
  • Bayer
  • Big Pharma
  • BIO
  • Biogen Idec
  • biologics
  • biosimilars
  • blogging
  • BMS
  • Boston Scientific
  • brand names
  • business development
  • business models
  • cancer vaccines
  • Carl Icahn
  • CBO
  • CDER
  • Celgene
  • Cephalon
  • China
  • clinical development
  • CMS
  • co-promotes
  • comparative effectiveness
  • conference
  • Congress
  • consumer genomics
  • corporate culture
  • corporate governance
  • corporate venture capital
  • CVS Caremark
  • Cytyc
  • David Kessler
  • deals of the week
  • debt financing
  • Diabetes
  • diagnostics
  • Dick Clark
  • drug approvals
  • drug delivery
  • drug discovery
  • drug eluting stents
  • Drug Pricing
  • drug safety
  • drug samples
  • DTC Advertising
  • e-health
  • Eisai
  • Elan
  • Eli Lilly
  • Emphasys
  • emphysema
  • Endo
  • epo
  • Euro-Biotech Forum
  • Exits
  • Exubera
  • FDA
  • FDA/CMS Summit
  • FDAAA
  • Film and TV
  • financing
  • FOBs
  • Forest Labs
  • Galvus
  • gene therapy
  • Genentech
  • General Electric
  • generics
  • Genzyme
  • Gleevec
  • Google
  • GSK
  • Guidant
  • haircuts
  • Happy Holidays
  • HCV
  • Headhunting
  • Health Care Reform
  • hedge funds
  • Henry Waxman
  • hGH
  • HHS
  • Hillary Clinton
  • Hologic
  • hostile takeovers
  • hypertension
  • ImClone
  • IMS Health
  • In vitro diagnostics
  • In3
  • India
  • insomnia
  • instrumentation
  • insulin
  • Inverness
  • IP
  • IPO
  • IPO pricing
  • Isis Pharmaceuticals
  • Israel
  • IT
  • JAMA
  • Januvia
  • Japan
  • John McCain
  • Johnson and Johnson
  • JP Morgan
  • LaMattina
  • lawsuits
  • layoffs
  • legislation
  • Life-Cycle Management
  • Lipitor
  • Lucentis
  • management succession
  • Mark McClellan
  • marketing
  • Martin Mackay
  • medical devices
  • Medicare
  • Medicare Part D
  • Medimmune
  • Medtech Insight
  • Medtronic
  • Merck
  • Merck-Serono
  • mergers and acquisitions
  • Michael McCaughan
  • Millennium
  • mmm beer
  • MRI
  • multiple sclerosis
  • music
  • nanotechnology
  • NEJM
  • new drug approvals
  • new funds
  • NICE
  • NicOx
  • NIH
  • Nobel Prize
  • Novartis
  • Novo Nordisk
  • Nycomed
  • off-label promotion
  • oncology
  • ophthalmology
  • Orthopedics
  • osteoporosis
  • OTC drugs
  • Out-Partnering
  • Oxycontin
  • pain
  • Part D
  • Patient Advocacy
  • PDUFA
  • personalized medicine
  • Pfizer
  • pharmacy benefits
  • PhRMA
  • politics
  • poll results
  • PR
  • prasugrel
  • Presidential Election
  • Press Release of the Week
  • Primary Care
  • private equity
  • Procter and Gamble
  • PSA
  • Purdue Pharma
  • rare diseases
  • reimbursement
  • research and development productivity
  • research and development strategies
  • reverse mergers
  • rimonabant
  • RiskMAP
  • RNAi
  • Roche
  • Roger Longman
  • royalties
  • sales forces
  • Sanofi-aventis
  • Schering-Plough
  • Science Matters
  • Sepracor
  • shameless self-promotion
  • share buybacks
  • Shire
  • Sirtris
  • Smith and Nephew
  • Solvay
  • SPACs
  • spec pharma
  • spin-outs
  • sports
  • Start-Up
  • statins
  • Steve Nissen
  • Stryker
  • Supreme Court
  • Takeda
  • Teva
  • Thanksgiving
  • The RPM Report
  • UCB
  • vaccines
  • Velcade
  • Ventana
  • venture capital
  • venture debt
  • Venture Round
  • Vertex
  • Vioxx
  • Vytorin
  • Wacky World of Generics
  • While You Were ...
  • Wyeth
  • Zetia
  • Zimmer
  • ZymoGenetics

Blog Archive

  • ►  2008 (76)
    • ►  February (25)
    • ►  January (51)
  • ▼  2007 (329)
    • ►  December (32)
    • ►  November (42)
    • ►  October (37)
    • ►  September (33)
    • ►  August (29)
    • ►  July (39)
    • ►  June (39)
    • ►  May (43)
    • ▼  April (16)
      • Sleep Tight, Kids!
      • GSK: Seeding More CEDDs?
      • Aim Low?
      • Bristol as Biotech
      • Bristol Continues Late-Stage Asset Sale
      • Back in the day
      • Press Release of the Week
      • MedImmune Investors Get Paid
      • Antisoma Licenses AS1404: The Sequel
      • The More The Money-er
      • More Insulin Problems
      • Strategic Alternatives: MedImmune Edition
      • Amgen's CFO: Escaping a Sinking Ship?
      • Take a Deep Breath, Pfizer, and Think Again
      • Everybody Plays, Everybody Wins
      • Novartis' Irritable Blockbuster Syndrome
    • ►  March (13)
    • ►  February (5)
    • ►  January (1)
  • ►  2006 (8)
    • ►  December (3)
    • ►  November (5)
Powered by Blogger.

About Me

Unknown
View my complete profile